Skip to content

Project Management | Research | Publishing | ICT | Training Solutions

Menu
  • HOME
  • WHO WE ARE
    • About Us
    • Our Team
  • WHAT WE DO
    • KENPRO BIOGAS PROGRAM
      • Kenpro Biogas for Schools
      • Kenpro Biogas Installation Project
    • KENPRO SOLAR PROGRAM
    • KENPRO GREEN BUILDING INITIATIVE (KGBI)
    • SMART AGRICULTURE
      • El-Paradiso Demo Farm
    • PROJECT MANAGEMENT UNIT
      • Funding Proposal Writing
      • Efunding Platform
      • Project Evaluation
      • Feasibility Studies
      • Baseline Surveys
    • RESEARCH UNIT
      • Research Proposal Writing
      • Data Coding and Analysis
    • PUBLISHING UNIT
      • ARJESS Publications
      • Academic Journals
      • Book Publishing
    • TRAINING UNIT
      • Project Management Training
      • Research Training
      • ICT Training
    • INTERNSHIP AND MENTORSHIP
  • OUR IMPACT
  • OUR PARTNERS
  • OPPORTUNITIES
    • Internship Program
    • Apply for Internship
    • Apply for training
  • CONTACTS
Menu

Stress Coping Mechanisms for Teachers

Posted on January 11, 2013October 3, 2014 by KENPRO

Anthony M. Wanjohi:

Coping refers to behavior that protects people from being psychologically harmed by problematic social experience (Pearlin and Schooler, 1978). Pearlin and Schooler maintain that the protective function of coping behavior can be exercised in three ways: by eliminating or modifying conditions giving rise to problems; by perceptually controlling the meaning of experience in a manner that neutralizes its problematic character; and by keeping the emotional consequences of problems within manageable bounds. This article examines   various stress coping mechanisms for teachers based on empirical evidence.

 

Kitenga (2009) conducted a study that examined the effectiveness of various coping mechanisms used by teachers in public primary schools in Kenya. The examined mechanisms included sharing with colleagues and friends, avoiding confrontations, practicing religion and getting to know pupils as individuals.

stress-coping-mechanisms

The most effective stress coping mechanisms according to the majority of teachers who took part in the study were the following: knowing pupils as individuals (74 per cent), practicing religion (57 per cent), avoiding direct confrontations (54 per cent) and sharing with colleagues and friends (51 per cent). Some of these mechanisms however are not universal; they are rather particular in relation to teaching profession. Folkman (1984) classifies coping mechanisms into two, namely: action-based coping and emotion-based coping mechanism. Action-based coping mechanisms involve dealing with a problem that is causing stress; this could be through planning, suppression of competing activities, confrontation, self-control, and restraint. Emotion-based coping mechanisms on the other hand reduce the symptoms of stress without addressing the source of the stress; this could be through discussing the stress with a friend, denial, repression, wishful thinking, distraction, relaxation, reappraisal, and humor.

 

The findings in the study revealed that teachers used both action based mechanisms like getting to know the individual pupils. However, most of the mechanisms employed appeared to have been emotion based mechanisms like discussing the problem with friends. The study also found that there were other emotional based mechanisms that teachers used. These included absenteeism from school, seeking for transfer, reading certain books. These mechanisms do not directly address the source of stress, thus may not result to lasting solution. Teachers should therefore seek more of action-based coping mechanisms.

 

References

Folkman, S. (1984). Personal control and stress and coping processes: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Personal and Social Psychology, 46: 839–85

 

Kitenga, B. N. (2009). Factors Contributing to Occupational Stress and Coping Mechanisms among Primary School Teachers in Ngong Division of Kajiado North District. Unpublished Thesis, Kenyatta University.

 

Pearling, L.I. and Schooler, C. (1978). The Structure of Coping. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, Vol. 19, No. 1 (Mar., 1978), pp. 2-21. American Sociological Association.

 

SEARCH KENPRO

PUBLICATIONS CATEGORIES

  • Academic Papers (53)
  • Agriculture (8)
  • Announcements (7)
  • ARJESS Publications (1)
  • Business Articles (15)
  • Education Articles (6)
  • El-Paradiso Demo Farm (2)
  • Environment Articles (12)
  • Funding Agencies (5)
  • Funding Proposal Services (4)
  • Health Articles (1)
  • Journals Index (7)
  • Kenpro Biogas Program (20)
  • Kenpro Green Building Initiative (1)
  • Kenpro Solar Program (5)
  • NGOs Network (4)
  • Project Management Articles (20)
  • Project Management Guide (3)
  • Publications (8)
  • Publishing Projects (1)
  • Renewable Energy (1)
  • Research Abstracts (5)
  • Research Proposal Guide (36)
  • Statistics Articles (5)
  • Technology Articles (4)
  • Training Program (2)
  • Uncategorized (10)

ADMIN

  • E-mail Login

SITE MENU

  • HOME
  • WHO WE ARE
    • About Us
    • Our Team
  • WHAT WE DO
    • KENPRO BIOGAS PROGRAM
      • Kenpro Biogas for Schools
      • Kenpro Biogas Installation Project
    • KENPRO SOLAR PROGRAM
    • KENPRO GREEN BUILDING INITIATIVE (KGBI)
    • SMART AGRICULTURE
      • El-Paradiso Demo Farm
    • PROJECT MANAGEMENT UNIT
      • Funding Proposal Writing
      • Efunding Platform
      • Project Evaluation
      • Feasibility Studies
      • Baseline Surveys
    • RESEARCH UNIT
      • Research Proposal Writing
      • Data Coding and Analysis
    • PUBLISHING UNIT
      • ARJESS Publications
      • Academic Journals
      • Book Publishing
    • TRAINING UNIT
      • Project Management Training
      • Research Training
      • ICT Training
    • INTERNSHIP AND MENTORSHIP
  • OUR IMPACT
  • OUR PARTNERS
  • OPPORTUNITIES
    • Internship Program
    • Apply for Internship
    • Apply for training
  • CONTACTS

PUBLICATIONS CATEGORIES

  • Academic Papers (53)
  • Agriculture (8)
  • Announcements (7)
  • ARJESS Publications (1)
  • Business Articles (15)
  • Education Articles (6)
  • El-Paradiso Demo Farm (2)
  • Environment Articles (12)
  • Funding Agencies (5)
  • Funding Proposal Services (4)
  • Health Articles (1)
  • Journals Index (7)
  • Kenpro Biogas Program (20)
  • Kenpro Green Building Initiative (1)
  • Kenpro Solar Program (5)
  • NGOs Network (4)
  • Project Management Articles (20)
  • Project Management Guide (3)
  • Publications (8)
  • Publishing Projects (1)
  • Renewable Energy (1)
  • Research Abstracts (5)
  • Research Proposal Guide (36)
  • Statistics Articles (5)
  • Technology Articles (4)
  • Training Program (2)
  • Uncategorized (10)

RECENT PUBLICATIONS

  • An Overview of Green Building Concept for Sustainable Housing
  • Step by Step Sample Size Determination for a Known Population Size
  • Paradox in Kenya’s Education System: Transitioning from 8-4-4 Education System to CBC to CBE
  • Team Morale Tips During Workplace Transitions
  • A Practical Guide to Soil Testing
  • The Hidden Costs of Poor Communication in Project Teams
  • Explaining the Theory of Change in the Context of Development Projects
  • Monitoring and Evaluation Training
  • About El-Paradiso Demo Farm
  • Components of Climate Smart Agriculture in Kenya’s Perspective
  • Leadership Styles for Managing Multicultural Teams
  • Online Jobs Opportunities For Youths in Kenya
  • Renewable Energy Solutions for Sustainable Community Development
  • Improvised Kenpro Portable Biogas Plant Design
  • Kenpro Biogas Technician Training Module
  • Implementing Change Management Strategies for Project Success
  • Kenpro Biogas for Schools Initiative: A Sustainable Cooking Energy Solution
  • Cost of Constructing Different Sizes of Biogas Plants in Kenya
©2025 KENPRO | This website is maintained by KENPRO ICT Team. For inquiries about our services, kindly contact us | E: kenprokenya@gmail.com | M: +254 725 788 400 |


All published content on this site reflects the views of the authors and not necessarily those of KENPRO.
The organization assumes no responsibility for errors or omissions in the content.